HumanLayer alternative
Looking for a HumanLayer alternative because an agent needs a person? This page is what each product publishes, including gotoHuman, the other one that documents a human-review MCP server.
Updated October 25, 2026
Every claim below is from the page it names, as of 17 October 2026. Nothing here is a score, a usage count, or a timing.
Comparison
| Invoke Human | HumanLayer | gotoHuman | |
|---|---|---|---|
| What it says it is | One inbox for every task your agents spawn. A remote MCP server and an app on iPhone, iPad, and Mac. | The homepage title is “the multiplayer control plane for your software factory.” The page calls it a multiplayer coding-agent IDE and cloud. The meta description says it brings agent sessions, plan artifacts, and code diffs together. | The homepage describes custom human reviews to approve and edit agent actions, with an Agent Inbox. The MCP README says it adds human approvals to AI agents and workflows. |
| How an agent connects | Remote streamable HTTP at invokehumantool.com/mcp. OAuth 2.1, PKCE S256, dynamic client registration, scope handoffs. No API key in the client config. | The homepage shows brew trust humanlayer/humanlayer and brew install humanlayer/humanlayer/humanlayer. That page does not document a remote MCP URL to paste into Cursor or Claude. | A local stdio process: npx -y @gotohuman/mcp-server with GOTOHUMAN_API_KEY. Same block on the MCP docs and the README. |
| What you set up first | The URL, then OAuth in the client. The guides are the per-client steps. | Their app, if you want the workspace the homepage describes: tasks, sessions, artifacts, a local daemon, and cloud daemons. | An API key and a review type at their app. The homepage’s first step is “Setup review” in a no-code editor. The agent then references that type. |
| Where a person answers | One inbox on iPhone, iPad, and Mac. A signed web page opens one handoff. It is not a second inbox. | The homepage says the same UI runs on web, desktop, or phone, for that coding workspace, including after the laptop is closed. | Their Agent Inbox. The homepage also documents email and Slack notifications. Completed reviews continue the workflow by webhook. |
| Tools they document | send_handoff, send_ui_handoff, send_html_handoff, validate_ui, share_handoff, delegate_handoff, get_handoff_status, get_handoff_result, and wait_for_handoff. | The homepage does not list MCP tools. On 17 October 2026, hlyr/README.md in the GitHub tree documented contact_human, humanlayer mcp serve, and humanlayer mcp claude_approvals. That path returned 404 on 24 October 2026. | list-forms, get-form-schema, and request-human-review-with-form. The last one returns reviewId and reviewLink. |
| Other people on the account | share_handoff invites more people onto a handoff. delegate_handoff forwards one you can reassign. An account is an email or an Apple ID. This site does not publish seats or a review-template editor. | The homepage describes a team workspace, tasks shared with an org, and a Starter plan free for teams of three or less. | The README documents assignToUsers, an optional list of email addresses, on request-human-review-with-form. The pricing page sells seats. |
| Price they publish | Beta. No price is published on this site. | A FAQ on the homepage says the Starter plan is free for teams of three or less. The pricing section lists SSO/SAML, audit logs, volume pricing, custom terms, and on-prem and private VPC. That page does not print a dollar amount. | The pricing page lists $0/month (1 user, up to 300 reviews a month, 7-day history), $79/month (5 users included), $350/month (20 users included), and a tier starting at $950/month (50 users included). It says prices exclude VAT. The $79 tier is described as everything in Starter, plus the items on that card. |
HumanLayer, from their own pages
As of 17 October 2026, humanlayer.com is a coding workspace. The visible headline is “The Multiplayer Coding Agent Workspace.” The document title is “HumanLayer - The multiplayer control plane for your software factory.” The meta description reads: “A multiplayer coding agent IDE and cloud that brings agent sessions, plan artifacts, and code diffs together in one place for your team to collaborate and ship.”
The page describes tasks that group sessions and artifacts, a local daemon, cloud daemons, and the same UI on web, desktop, or phone. A FAQ says you bring your own Claude, Codex, and other subscriptions or API keys. Another FAQ names Claude Code, Codex, Copilot, and Fireworks as supported agents. Another says the product is not open source yet, and that their Research, Plan, Implement framework already is. The page says HumanLayer is SOC 2 Type II compliant.
That is a place to run coding agents with your team. It is not, on that page, a URL you paste into Cursor so an existing agent can ask you a question.
What their README says about the old code
The repository README is short. Fetched on 17 October 2026, the body is:
public issues repo for humanlayer - the code here is pretty much all deprecated - you can try the rebuild of humanlayer at https://humanlayer.com - thanks for all your support - dex
The quote is about the code in that repository, as fetched on 17 October 2026. This page does not say the product on humanlayer.com shut down. On 24 October 2026 the same README describes the current coding workspace and no longer contains that sentence.
As fetched on 17 Oct 2026, hlyr/README.md in that tree documented npx humanlayer contact_human, HUMANLAYER_API_KEY, Slack and email contact channels, a note that the web UI is the default when no channel is set, humanlayer mcp serve, and humanlayer mcp claude_approvals. It also showed Claude Code’s --permission-prompt-tool pointed at mcp__approvals__request_permission. On 24 Oct 2026 that path returned 404, and the root README describes the current humanlayer CLI, so this page no longer links the missing file. Those commands are not copied here as setup steps.
gotoHuman, from their own pages
As of 17 October 2026, the MCP docs and the server README publish this config:
{
"mcpServers": {
"gotoHuman": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "@gotohuman/mcp-server"],
"env": {
"GOTOHUMAN_API_KEY": "your-api-key"
}
}
}
}
The README’s tools are list-forms, get-form-schema (parameter formId), and request-human-review-with-form (formId, fieldData, and optional config, title, webhookUrl, metadata, assignToUsers, and workflow.runId). You create the review type and the API key at their app before the first call.
The homepage describes four steps: set up a review type, send a request, review it in the Agent Inbox or from a notification, and handle the webhook. Besides MCP it lists an n8n node, Make, TypeScript and Python SDKs, a LangGraph example, and an HTTP API. It says the service is GDPR-compliant, that data is stored on European servers, that data is encrypted in transit and at rest, and that the core services they use are certified under SOC 3 and ISO 27001. Those are their descriptions. This page has not audited them.
The pricing page is the source for the dollar amounts in the table.
Invoke Human
The server is https://invokehumantool.com/mcp. Clients sign in with OAuth 2.1. The authorization server publishes dynamic client registration and PKCE S256. The scope is handoffs. You do not put a key in the client config. The remote MCP guide is the 401 and the metadata.
The tools are send_handoff, send_ui_handoff, send_html_handoff, validate_ui, share_handoff, delegate_handoff, get_handoff_status, get_handoff_result, and wait_for_handoff. A question, an approval, a worksheet, or a form the agent generated for this task lands in one inbox on iPhone, iPad, and Mac. Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, Codex, and a custom MCP client share that inbox because they share your account. Setup is the hub and the guides.
It does not run your coding agent, host a daemon, or store a repo session tree. If that is the product you wanted, HumanLayer’s current site is the one to read.
There is no published price. Pricing says what is free during beta. share_handoff and delegate_handoff invite or forward a handoff. This site does not publish a review template you design first, or an assignToUsers field.
How to pick
Pick HumanLayer’s current product when you want the coding-agent workspace their homepage describes. Do not pick it from an old tutorial about contact_human. As fetched on 17 Oct 2026, the README said the code there is pretty much all deprecated. On 24 Oct 2026 that README describes the current humanlayer CLI, and hlyr/README.md returns 404.
Pick gotoHuman when the human step is a review you can design once, when you want a webhook, n8n, or Make, or when you need to assign a review to someone by email. Their MCP server assumes the template and the API key exist.
Pick Invoke Human when the agents are already Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, Codex, or another MCP client, and you want each of them to call a person without a local process or a key in the config. The agent can ask a one-off question or send a form it just built. You answer on the device you have with you.
Older notes at /alternatives/humanlayer and /alternatives/gotohuman stay up so existing links open. This page is the comparison.
Questions
Is HumanLayer deprecated?
No. humanlayer.com, fetched on 17 October 2026, describes a product you can install. The README fetched that day said "the code here is pretty much all deprecated" and pointed at humanlayer.com. That sentence is about the code in the repository. It is not a claim that the current product shut down. On 24 October 2026 the README describes the current workspace and does not contain that sentence.
Does the HumanLayer repo still document an MCP server?
As fetched on 17 Oct 2026, hlyr/README.md documented humanlayer mcp serve, humanlayer mcp claude_approvals, and npx humanlayer contact_human. On 24 Oct 2026 that path returned 404, and the root README describes the current humanlayer CLI. Those commands are not restated here as a current install.
How does gotoHuman's MCP server connect?
As of 17 October 2026, docs.gotohuman.com/mcp-server and the gotohuman-mcp-server README show a local npx process and a GOTOHUMAN_API_KEY. The tools they document are list-forms, get-form-schema, and request-human-review-with-form.